India’s ambition to become a global electric vehicle manufacturing hub is clear and resolute. The government’s newly launched Scheme to Promote Manufacturing of Electric Passenger Cars in India (SPMEPCI) offers sweeping incentives designed to attract leading global and domestic EV manufacturers. Yet, beneath the promise lies a significant roadblock troubling foreign investors—the demand for hefty bank guarantees as part of the scheme’s compliance and safeguarding measures. This requirement is increasingly cited as constraining foreign EV investment inflows, complicating capital allocation, and slowing down the pace of new manufacturing projects.
This article explores the structure of India’s bank guarantee demands, why they matter to foreign investors, how these requirements affect investment decisions in the EV sector, and the larger implications for India’s green mobility aspirations.
India’s New EV Manufacturing Policy: Investment and Compliance
India’s SPMEPCI, announced in March 2024 and operationalized in mid-2025, targets rapid scale-up of domestic electric passenger vehicle production. Participating companies receive significant customs duty reductions—lowering import duties from around 70-110% to 15% on fully built electric vehicle imports—but only if they commit to large-scale local investment: a minimum of ₹4,150 crore (approximately $485 million) within three years.
This investment must cover plant expansion, machinery, research and development expenditure, and infrastructure for manufacturing electric vehicles. Additionally, companies must progressively increase domestic value addition (DVA) to 25% by year 3 and 50% by year 5.
To ensure fidelity, companies must furnish bank guarantees equal to:
- The higher of the total customs duty waived or ₹4,150 crore
- The guarantee remains valid for the scheme period (5 years)
- Failure to meet investment and localization commitments results in forfeiture of the guarantee
This rigorous financial stewardship echoes India’s efforts to avoid misuse of tax incentives and enforce genuine local manufacturing, but it also places a substantial liquid capital demand on investor companies.
Read Also: EV Charging Stations in Kandal: A 2025 Guide to Cambodia’s Electric Mobility Transformation
Why Strict Bank Guarantees Matter for Foreign Investors
Bank guarantees represent irrevocable financial commitments backed by banks to cover potential defaults. They lock up significant capital and carry associated fees, which for multinational automakers can amount to tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. For foreign manufacturers eyeing India, several factors make these requirements particularly challenging:
- Capital Ties and Liquidity Constraints: Bank guarantees constrain a firm’s liquidity, limiting capital available for other investments or operational needs globally. Automakers operate on tight capital budgets between factories worldwide, making large upfront guarantee postings less appealing.
- Financial and Regulatory Complexity: Companies must navigate Indian banking procedures, secure guarantees in local banks or establish reciprocal international banking relations—both time-consuming and costly processes from a compliance and administrative standpoint.
- Investment Risk and Uncertainty: The irrevocable guarantee exposes companies to loss of significant funds if government requirements are not met because of unforeseen delays, regulatory changes, or market disruptions—risks heightened by India’s evolving and still-maturing automotive policy environment.
- Competitive Disadvantage: Competing countries offer EV incentives with less stringent financial sureties. Some markets provide subsidies after milestones are met rather than preemptive guarantees, which enhances attractiveness and speed of investment decisions.
The cumulative effect is that some global EV majors perceive the required bank guarantees as disproportionately risky and capital-intensive, influencing their hesitancy or selective slowing of formal investment commitments in India.
Evidence of Investment Slowdown and Concerns
Since the implementation of these requirements, India’s Ministry of Heavy Industries has seen interest from industry giants including Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz, Hyundai, and Kia. Most have begun formal processes but with careful caution due to the guarantee environment.
Notably, Tesla has shown reluctance to participate fully in local manufacturing under the scheme, with government officials indicating the company would initially limit itself to showroom expansion rather than plant investments, largely due to the stringent financial and operational criteria.
From industry insiders, capital-intensive guarantees combined with rapid local content mandates are cited as slowing down the tempo of announced EV factory launches or expansions by some foreign companies, who remain watchful for policy relaxations or modifications before escalating investments.
Impact on India’s EV Industry and Policy Outlook
While the bank guarantees align with India’s objective of minimizing policy exploitation and ensuring real, substantial industrial growth, their short-term effect paradoxically dampens foreign investment enthusiasm.
Some analysts argue India could explore more balanced mechanisms such as:
- Phased or escrowed guarantees tied to project progress
- Partial guarantees covering only a percentage of duty waivers
- Incentives combined with flexible compliance timelines
- Enhanced dialogue and feedback frameworks with industry to optimize policy design
Adjustments along these lines could sustain investor confidence while preserving government safeguards.
Experts emphasize that India’s EV ambitions—critical for sustainable mobility and climate goals—depend on striking an optimal equilibrium between robust policy enforcement and a conducive investment climate that leverages global capital and expertise.
Read Also: EV Charging Stations in Kampot: Cambodia’s 2025 Guide to Sustainable Electric Mobility
How Indian EV Manufacturers are Responding
While foreign investors navigate the financial tightening, Indian EV startups and domestic automakers like Tata Motors and Mahindra are advancing investments more aggressively, helped by deeper familiarity with local banking systems and government processes.
They also factor in broader programs like the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes that focus on scaling manufacturing and value addition, which may offer more adaptable investment pathways for domestic players.
Nevertheless, domestic players too face challenges of mobilizing large upfront capital and delivering localization commitments under aggressive timelines.
Conclusion: Balancing Policy with Investment Growth
India’s strict bank guarantees for foreign EV manufacturing investments represent both a milestone in ensuring disciplined industrial growth and a bottleneck slowing the influx of vital global capital and technology. The guarantee requirements protect India’s economic and strategic interests by driving genuine local production and preventing superficial exploitation of incentives.
However, the capital lockup and risk burden inherent in these requirements dampen the investment appetite of many leading international automakers who are critical to India’s goal of becoming a global EV manufacturing powerhouse.
The path forward requires nuanced policy calibration, fostering an ecosystem where safeguards coexist with flexibility and investor confidence. Incremental reforms that ease guarantee demands without compromising enforcement could accelerate foreign EV investments, catalyze technology transfer, and strengthen India’s green manufacturing aspirations.
In the intensely competitive global automotive landscape of 2025 and beyond, India’s ability to attract and retain foreign EV investment hinges on how it balances this delicate interplay between stringent policy measures and enabling growth incentives.